|
 |
|
CASE REPORT |
|
|
|
| Year : 2015 | Volume
: 10
| Issue : 3 | Page : 237-239 |
| |
Diastematomyelia with hemimyelomeningocele: An exceptional and complex spinal dysraphism
Neha Singh1, Deepak Kumar Singh2, Rakesh Kumar2
1 Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| Date of Web Publication | 18-Sep-2015 |
Correspondence Address:
Deepak Kumar Singh
Department of Neurosurgery, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow - 226 010, Uttar Pradesh
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.165665
 Abstract | | |
Variations in split cord malformation (SCM) have been described earlier. However, a true hemimyelomeningocele (HMM) as only congenital malformation is extremely rare and is reported infrequently in published literature. We are reporting the case of a 3-month-old girl child who presented with a swelling on the lower back since birth. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a type 1 SCM with right hemicord forming a HMM. Precise diagnosis and thorough anatomical detail of dysraphism is essential for optimal, individualized neurosurgical management.
Keywords: Diastematomyelia, hemimyelomeningocele, spinal dysraphism, split cord malformation type 1
How to cite this article:
Singh N, Singh DK, Kumar R. Diastematomyelia with hemimyelomeningocele: An exceptional and complex spinal dysraphism. J Pediatr Neurosci 2015;10:237-9 |
| Case Report | |  |
A 3-month-old girl child presented to us with a history of swelling on back since birth. She had a history of full term normal vaginal delivery with no significant family history. Her developmental milestones were normal for age. On neurological examination there was complete flaccid paralysis of right lower extremity with normal anal tone.
On local examination, swelling was soft, cystic, and tensile with positive fluid thrill. Neural elements were visible on translucency examination. An initial diagnosis of a myelomeningocele was made and patient was referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of neuraxis.
MRI spine revealed a bony spur at D11 level dividing the spinal cord into two halves suggesting Pang type 1 split cord malformation (SCM) or diastematomyelia. Right hemicord, along with meninges and cerebrospinal fluid was herniating through the defect in posterior element of same vertebra forming a large hemimeningomyelocele [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. Both hemicords were reuniting below the level of herniation. | Figure 1: T2-weighted sagittal (a) and coronal (b) magnetic resonance imaging of dorso-lumbar spine shows a hemivertebrae from D10 to D12 level along with a bony spur at D11. Tethering of cord and meningomyelocele is also visible. Continuation of left hemicord is appreciable in coronal view (b)
Click here to view |
 | Figure 2: T2 weighted axial image shows a bony spur dividing the cord into two halves (a and b). Herniation of right hemicord, meninges and cerebrospinal fluid is noted through the defect in posterior element, forming a large hemi-meningomyelocele (c). Two hemicords are visible below the level of herniation (d) which reunites at D12 level to form a single cord (e)
Click here to view |
Based on clinical examination and MRI a final diagnosis of SCM type 1 with right hemimyelomeningocele (HMM) was made and patient was prepared for surgery.
Surgery was carried out through a mid-line skin incision. Excision of bony spur along with microneurosurgical dissection and meticulous layered closure of myelomeningocele was achieved. Patient was discharged on eighth postoperative day without any additional neurological deficit.
| Discussion | | |
According to Pang's unified theory of embryogenesis, [1] the whole spectrum of split cord syndrome originates from one basic ontogenic error occurring around the time of primitive neurenteric canal closure. This basic error is the formation of "accessory neurenteric canal" between the amniotic cavity and the yolk sac. This abnormal fistulous connection bisects the notochord and the neural plate on approximately postovulatory day 18. Each hemineural plate undergoes neurulation in order to its own heminotochord. Final appearance of matured SCM depends on the ability of the embryo to heal around this abnormal fistulous connection aka endomesenchymal tract. According to Pang et al., formation of endomesenchymal tract before postovulatory day 21 gives rise to SCM type 2 or diplomyelia, whereas formation of this tract after postovulatory day 30 gives rise to SCM type 1 or distematomyelia. The formation of this tract between postovulatory day 21 and 30 gives rise to composite/mixed SCM. [1],[2]
Each hemineural plate undergoes neurulation in which, the neural folds converge and fuse each other in relation to their respective hemi-notochords. This process of primary neurulation occurs between postovulatory days 22-28. In case of neurulation defect on one side, HMM or hemimeningocele may occur. Our patient has hemimeningocle on the right side.
Myelomeningocele are frequently associated with Chiari malformation More Details [3] diastematomyelia (up to 45% in some reported series) [4] and other congenital vertebral defects such as spondylocostal dysostosis, [5] Jarcho-Levin syndrome, Klippel-Feil anomaly and a wide range of syndromic malformation complexes, but true hemimeningocele, where a single hemicord fails to neurulate is rare. [6],[7] The neurological deficit in children with HMM is less severe than compared to myelomeningocele patients and is limited only to the side of exposed hemicord. Our patient has flaccid paralysis on the right side.
| Conclusion | | |
This case report highlights the importance of detailed imaging of complete neuraxis in cases of spinal dysraphism for optimal neurosurgical management. Second the rarity of this condition suggests that formation of the endomesenchymal tract and neurulation defect are two separate embryological events, and their coexistence at the same level is only by chance though more inputs are warranted in this regard.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Pang D, Dias MS, Ahab-Barmada M. Split cord malformation: Part I: A unified theory of embryogenesis for double spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery 1992;31:451-80.  |
| 2. | Salunke P, Kovai P, Malik V, Sharma M. Mixed split cord malformation: Are we missing something? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011;113:774-8. |
| 3. | Rowley VB, Johnson AJ. Lumbar split cord malformation with lateral hemimyelomeningocele and associated Chiari II malformation and other visceral and osseous anomalies: A case report. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:923-6. |
| 4. | Ansari S, Nejat F, Yazdani S, Dadmehr M. Split cord malformation associated with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg 2007;107 4 Suppl: 281-5. |
| 5. | Al Kaissi A, Stuecker R, Ganger R, Klaushofer K, Grill F. Spinal and pelvic corrections in a patient with spondylocostal dysplasia syndrome and hemimyelomeningocele. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2014;11:341-6. |
| 6. | Jans L, Vlummens P, Van Damme S, Verstraete K, Abernethy L. Hemimyelomeningocele : a0 rare and complex spinal dysraphism. JBR-BTR 2008;91:198-9. |
| 7. | Merrow AC, Guion CJ. Hemimyelomeningocele. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40 Suppl 1:S168. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
PEDIATRIC SPINAL DYSRAPHISM ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING: TRENDS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN NORTH INDIA |
|
| Aindrila Khatua, Anil Taneja | | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. 2022; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
|
