|
 |
|
CASE REPORT |
|
|
|
| Year : 2021 | Volume
: 16
| Issue : 3 | Page : 240-246 |
| |
Cervical osteoma in hereditary multiple exostoses
Jitender Chaturvedi1, Niraj Kumar2, Jitendra Shakya1, Anil Kumar Sharma3
1 Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
2 Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
3 Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| Date of Submission | 25-Feb-2020 |
| Date of Decision | 30-May-2020 |
| Date of Acceptance | 02-Aug-2020 |
| Date of Web Publication | 07-Jan-2022 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jitender Chaturvedi
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Level-6, Medical College Building, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jpn.JPN_39_20
 Abstract | | |
Osteoid osteoma is a benign bony pathology. It presents either as a solitary lesion or as multiple lesions with a genetic predisposition. Reported more often in teenagers with thrice more common incidence among boys than in girls, it has a predilection for long bones of lower limbs. Less commonly arising from iliac crest or ribs; it is seen to be further rare to have originated from vertebrae or tarsal/carpal bones. Cranial osteomas are detected either incidentally on imaging or present as a bony hard swelling arising from the skull. Spinal intracanal osteomas are extremely rare to encounter in clinical practice. Cervical intracanal lesion in a case of hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) presenting with myelopathy is further rare. Less than thirty such cases have been reported so far. We present here a rare case of HME in a 16-year-old boy with compressive myelopathy secondary to intracanal cervical osteoma at C4 Lamina and spinous process. He had a phenotypical expression of hereditary multiple osteomas with a strong family history of inheritance of trait among first-degree male relatives favoring genetic transmission of disease with variable penetrance. All reported cases, to date, are discussed in a tabulated form.
Keywords: Cervical, hereditary multiple exostosis, myelopathy, osteoma, spine
How to cite this article:
Chaturvedi J, Kumar N, Shakya J, Sharma AK. Cervical osteoma in hereditary multiple exostoses. J Pediatr Neurosci 2021;16:240-6 |
| Case | |  |
A 16-year-old-boy presented with complaints of the stiffness of all four limbs for the last 2 months. To begin with, stiffness started with his right lower limb and gradually progressed to involve the rest of the three limbs. He also developed difficulty in initiation of micturition lasting 3 weeks. There was no history of head/spine injury in past, neck pain, fever, weight loss, facial asymmetry, change in speech, or difficulty in swallowing.
Of importance, he had multiple bony hard swellings all over the body for the last 8 years. On enquiring, he recalled that the first swelling to have arisen was in right shin 8 years back. Similar bony hard swellings were subsequently noted in the left calf and left scapula, which was soon followed in the right pelvis and multiple digits of both hands. Born out of the nonconsanguineous marriage of his parents, the patient had two brothers and three sisters. None of his sisters, but both of his brothers, had similar phenotypical features of multiple bony swellings arising from different bones spread all over their bodies. Son of his elder brother also suffered from this illness. None of his male relatives had symptoms suggestive of spinal compressive myelopathy; in fact, two of his brothers had experienced spontaneous regression of their extra-spinal swellings throughout the illness. Pedigree suggests a Y-chromosome related inheritance with variable penetrance of the trait.
On general physical examination, the patient was averagely built and moderately nourished with no evidence of cranial/spinal deformity. There were no features of neurocutaneous markers like hypopigmented patches or firm subcutaneous neurofibromas. However, he had multiple bony hard noncompressible swellings densely adhering to underlying bones. These swellings were noted at the left scapula, left calf, right tibia, right pelvic bone, and multiple phalanges of both hands, as seen in [Supplementary Figure 1]. Neurological examination discloses motor weakness of all four limbs with the power of 3/5 on MRC grade. He was not able to stand or walk, not even with support. On sensory examination, he had bilaterally symmetrical graded sensory loss below the seventh cervical dermatome. Pathological reflexes like Hoffman and Babinski reflex were present bilaterally. The patient was evaluated with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine with whole spine screening. MRI cervical spine [Figure 1]A and B reveals T1- as well as T2-hypointense lesion arising from the posterior element of C4 vertebrae and protruding into the spinal canal at this level to make it significantly stenosed. Pathology was in exact anatomical and signal continuity of the fourth cervical vertebrae’s bony posterior element. Spinal cord was critically compressed and shows signal changes in favor of focal myelomalacia extending from the lower border of C3 to the lower border of C6. CT Cervical spine [Figure 2]A–C confirms this bony lesion as a broad-based cortical pathology originating from the ventral surface of the spinous process of C4 and protruding into the spinal canal to occupy almost eighty percent of canal space. On screening the rest of the spine, there was no evidence of lesion anywhere else except at C4. He was also evaluated with X-rays for various bony swellings [Supplementary Figure 2]. | Supplementary Figure 1: (A–D) Osseous lesions seen in various parts of musculoskeletal system of the patient. (A) Left calf. (B) Left scapula. (C) Right index finger. (D) Right pelvic bone
Click here to view |
 | Figure 1: (A and B) MRI Cervical spine, sagittal. T1- as well as T2-hypo-intense lesion arising from the posterior element of C4 vertebrae and protruding into spinal canal at this level. Canal is significantly stenosed with obliteration of CSF spaces both above and below C4. Lesion has anatomical as well as signal continuity with bone of posterior element of fourth cervical vertebrae. Spinal cord is critically compressed and shows signal changes in favor of focal myelomalacia extending from lower border of C3 to lower border of C6
Click here to view |
 | Figure 2: (A, B, and C) CT cervical spine, axial and sagittal. Hyperdense broad-based cortical pathology, from ventral surface of the spinous process of C4 and adjoining laminae on either side, protruding into canal to occupy almost all of canal space, to virtually reach up to the dorsal surface of vertebral body itself
Click here to view |
 | Supplementary Figure 2: (A) X-ray right knee AP view. Radio-opaque sessile lesion with irregular but sharp margins seen originating from proximal end of tibia. (B) X-ray right hip joint AP view. Densely radio-opaque pedunculated lesion with sharp margins originating from anterior superior iliac spine. (C) X-ray left scapula, AP view. Irregular bony growth with mixed radiodensity is appreciated at inferior angle of left scapula
Click here to view |
Based upon his clinical and imaging features, working diagnosis of cervical compressive myelopathy secondary to fourth cervical vertebrae (posterior element) osteoma in multiple hereditary exostoses was considered. Under general anesthesia and prone position, he underwent C4 laminectomy and complete excision of the lesion. Intraoperatively, spinous processes of C4 was found to be anomalously thickened and irregularly broadened. The lesion was extending on to the ventral aspect of the lamina of the pathological vertebra. Underlying ligamentum flavum and dura was thickened and infiltrated with granulomatous tissue, possibly a longstanding pathological reaction. To release pressure on neural elements, both of these structures were opened, arachnoid was kept intact, the cord was seen pulsating, no CSF leak encountered. It was possible to close dura primarily after releasing the infiltrating overlying granulomatous tissue. The specimen of the pathology is seen in [Figure 3]. Wound closed in layers, and the patient reversed from anesthesia with no new deficits. The histopathological study confirmed a diagnosis of osteoma based upon findings of dense, compact, and cortical bone with a mature lamellar lesion. He was discharged home on the fourth postop day. The postop CT cervical spine is shown in [Figure 4], which confirms complete excision. At discharge, he had symptomatic improvement with a sense of release in the tightness of limbs and subjective improvement of paresthesia. At third month postsurgery, he was able to walk on his own, although with some jerks of residual spasticity. His urinary bladder control was also recovered. | Figure 3: Intraoperative image of osteoma excised en-block. Antero-posterior length of lesion noted is approximately 1.5 cm
Click here to view |
 | Figure 4: (A and B) CT cervical spine, axial and sagittal images revealing post-C4 laminectomy status and complete excision of the lesion with opening up of the cervical canal
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
Osteoid osteoma is a benign bony pathology. Histologically, it has a vascularized nidus located centrally. A capricious volume of neo-osteogenesis further surrounds this nidus. Nidus more than 20 mm are referred to as osteoblastoma, as noted in our patient’s multiple extra-spinal anatomical locations. Clinically, it is seen more often than not in teenagers, with three times more frequency among boys than in girls.[1] Night pains are quite common complaints, which respond well to salicylates.
The most common bone to suffer from this benign pathology is the proximal end of the femur. Clinically, up to 70%–80% of all osteomas are located in long bones; only less than 10% are seen in the spine. Iliac crest and ribs are involved in 40%–60% of cases. Further rare are tarsal and carpal bones, seen to be involved in less than 7% of cases. Osteomas constitute a very rare pathology for spinal tumors. Setti et al.[2] reported a case of a 34-years-old male with C6 pedicle Ivory osteoma. Both before and after this publication, reporting of cervical osteomas (osteomas of axis vertebrae (Odontoid) and sub-axial spine) are rarely seen in the literature. Recently, in 2016, a dynamic component of compression over neural elements were reported.[3] The subaxial cervical spine is again not a common location for osteoma.
Among those seen in the spine, most are located only in the lumbar region, up to seventy percent. Only 20%–25% of all spinal osteomas originate in cervical spine, and very rarely they are encountered in the sacrum or dorsal spine. Therefore, less than 2% of all osteomas are located in the cervical spine. Most of the osteomas in a case of HME do not cause neural compression, as they may have exostoses growth from the outer surface of the laminae. One such rare case example in which two cervical osteomas were noted was published in 1996. In this case, one lesion was originating from the outer surface of C4 lamina, and the symptomatic one was growing inside the canal at C2 lamina, causing significant cord compression.[4]
There are only a few case reports published in the literature for cervical osteoma in a case of multiple hereditary exostoses. At the time of writing this manuscript, and to the best of author’s knowledge, the total number of cervical compressive myelopathy cases secondary to HME published was thirty, including the present case. These all cases are summarised in [Table 1]. Vertebral levels of osteomas, age, and gender of patients, procedure, and surgery; all are described in detail. | Table 1: Summary of all cervical osteoid osteomas in hereditary multiple exostoses reported so far
Click here to view |
The most common location for cervical osteoma in HME reported so far is C2 Lamina(n = 9),[1],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] followed by posterior arches of either C1 (n = 2)[12],[13] or C6 (n = 2).[14],[15] One of these patients with symptomatic C2 laminar osteoma was a 17-year-old boy with 2-month duration of myelopathy, also had an osteoma arising from external surface of C4 posterior arch.[4] Symptomatic multi-level involvement extending from C3 to C6 has also been reported.[16] In one of the reports, the exact site of pathology in C2 Vertebrae is not mentioned.[17] One report failed to provide the exact details on cervical level from which the osteoma seemed to have originated.[18]
C5 laminar origin of osteoma with its pedicle involvement, lateral mass origin in C7, and posterior arch origin in C7 in single case each, respectively, was seen.[19],[20],[21]
Origin of osteoma from foramen magnum[11] is reported in a single case, with C2 Odontoid involvement in another.[22]
As far as the anterior element of vertebrae is concerned, four separate cases with involvement of vertebral bodies of C5 in one,[23] C6 in another,[21] and C7-T1 in two other cases,[24],[25] respectively, are reported.
Two separate case reports dealt with the upper thoracic vertebral level osteomas, one in T4, another in T5 secondary to left rib origin.[26],[27] Both of these cases had compression and extension rostral enough to have caused cervical myelopathy.
Of all the thirty reported cases of HME with cervical compressive myelopathy, twenty were males, and almost fifty percent (n = 14, ten boys and four girls) had presented before completing 18 years of age.
Posterior decompression alone was sufficient enough in all cases, except two reports where anterior fixation was done. One of them was a C5 vertebral body lesion in a 12-year-old girl,[23] and another was after multi-level (C3–C6) posterior decompression in a 16-year-old boy.[16]
In three cases, urgent decompression was needed owing to an acute presentation of apnoea in upper cervical compression secondary to osteoma at C2, C5, and C1, respectively. Two out of these three patients succumbed after urgent surgery.[19],[22] The survivor was a 23-year-old female who had been suffering from tetraplegia for a 16-month duration and suddenly became apnoeic before taking up for urgent decompression.[12]
Treatment of osteomas differs according to their location and symptomatology. Treatment options range from observation and pain management to surgical excision. Radiofrequency, alcohol, or laser ablation are the less invasive modalities of treatment. Undoubtedly, surgical excision is preferred over other modalities when pathology causes compression over neural structures, as in the present case. After decompression of neural structures is achieved with complete excision of the lesion, spinal fixation is a valid option for preventing spinal instability. This instability is anticipated more when complete excision of lesion demands corpectomy/multiple laminectomies or in lesions that involve facet joints/inter-vertebral joints. In such rare cases, authors preferred to anteriorly fix the spine from C4 to C7 using plate and screw system after the extensive lesion from C3 to C6 was completely excised to achieve adequate neural decompression.[16] In their case, the decision to anteriorly fix the spine appears quite rationale to prevent future kyphosis and instability in a high-risk adolescent male. However, single-level laminectomies without joint involvement can be managed without spinal fixation. This necessitates adequate and periodic follow-ups for monitoring, as is the case in the present report.
Alternative treatment options like radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are utilized only in the absence of neural compression by osteoma. A study published in 2018, which compares CT-guided RFA vs. Open surgical resection (OSR), concluded that RFA is safe and equally effective for the treatment of osteoid osteoma.[28] Patients treated with RFA have shorter hospital stays and experience minimum blood loss with comparable recurrence rates, provided more than 1 mm CSF space between the lesion and Spinal cord/nerve root. The authors further recommended that in the case of the spinal cord or root compression, surgical excision of the lesion is undisputed treatment.
Osteoid osteomas may present either as a solitary lesion or as multiple lesions with a genetic predisposition in the background of HME. Primary prognostic importance in delineating these two entities lies in the fact of the stark difference in recurrence or malignant transformation risk. The risk of recurrences is very high, with the background of HME (up to 25%) in comparison to the solitary lesion (close to 1%). Therefore, spinal osteomas causing cord compression need to be excised completely, both for symptomatic relief and for reducing recurrences.
Pathology of intracanal osteoma in differentials for clinical myelopathy in multiple hereditary exostoses appears straightforward. However, the importance of this clinicopathological fact is being reflected in this rare case. This is not a routine clinical spectrum for neurosurgeons to deal with. Complete surgical excision is invariably the treatment of choice to provide recurrence-free symptomatic improvement. The presence of a very strong positive family history for male inheritance in this case also reflects the significance of hereditary transmission of traits of spinal bony tumors. However, this hereditary transmission may be reflected clinically, with incomplete penetrance of the trait.
| Conclusion | | |
Cervical intracanal osteoma is a rare pathology to cause a clinical syndrome of compressive myelopathy. When associated with multiple osteomas secondary to hereditary transmission, it further becomes an out of the ordinary clinical picture in neurosurgical practice. Very few cases, only close to thirty, have been reported in the past. This case illustrates one such rare pathology in clinical practice. Authors share all phenotypical, genetic inheritance, imaging, and surgical features they came across for an interesting and rare neurosurgical clinical entity. Complete surgical resection with meticulous techniques of handling delicate compressed neural tissue in high cervical cord gives excellent results in these osteomas and prevents recurrences. Distinct familial male inheritance is a robust genetic behavior of pathology.[30]
Patient consent statement
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Aniba K, Aldea S, Gaillard S [Cervical cord compression by hereditary multiple exostosis: case report and review of literature]. Neurochirurgie 2011;57:85-7.  |
| 2. | Setti S, Rengachary, MD, Abhay Sanan, MD Ivory osteoma of the cervical spine: case report. Neurosurgery 1998;42:182-5. |
| 3. | Kanaya K, Ito K, Horiuchi T, Hongo K “Dynamic” rotational canal stenosis caused by osteoma of the atlas: a case report and review of literature. NMC Case Rep J 2016;3:17-20. |
| 4. | Atabay H, Kuyucu Y, Korkmaz O, Iplikcioğlu AC Myelopathy due to hereditary multiple exostoses: CT and MR studies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1996;98:186-8. |
| 5. | Ochsner EH, Rothstein T XII. Multiple exostoses, including an exostosis within the spinal canal with surgical and neurological observations. Ann Surg 1907;46:608-16. |
| 6. | Carmel PW, Cra006Der FJ Cervical cord compression due to exostosis in a patient with hereditary multiple exostoses. Case report. J Neurosurg 1968;28:500-3. |
| 7. | Facure J, Facure NO, Castro LF [Hereditary multiple exostosis with spinal cord compression]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1975;33:151-5. |
| 8. | Ferrari G, Taddei L, Vivenza C, Rossi G Paraparesis in hereditary multiple exostoses: case report. Neurology 1979;29:973-7. |
| 9. | Nunez DA, Graham HK, Fixsen JA Cervical cord compression and femoral neuropathy in hereditary multiple exostoses. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:439. |
| 10. | Shapiro SA, Javid T, Putty T Osteochondroma with cervical cord compression in hereditary multiple exostoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990;15:600-2. |
| 11. | Madigan R, Worrall T, McClain EJ Cervical cord compression in hereditary multiple exostosis. Review of the literature and report of a case. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:401-4. |
| 12. | Wen DY, Bergman TA, Haines SJ Acute cervical myelopathy from hereditary multiple exostoses: case report. Neurosurgery 1989;25:472-5. |
| 13. | Vinstein AL, Franken EA Hereditary multiple exostoses: report of a case with spinal cord compression. Am J Roentgenol 1971;112:405-7. |
| 14. | Slepian A, Hamby WB Neurologic complications associated with hereditary deforming chondrodysplasia; review of the literature and a report of two cases occurring in the same family. J Neurosurg 1951;8:529-35. |
| 15. | Thomas ML, Andress MR Osteochondroma of the cervical spine causing cord compression. Br J Radiol 1971;44: 549-51. |
| 16. | Ergün R, Ökten Aİ, Beşkonakli E, Akdemir G, Taskin Y Cervical laminar exostosis in multiple hereditary osteochondromatosis: anterior stabilization and fusion technique for preventing instability. Eur Spine J 1997;6:267-9. |
| 17. | Reid J Diseases of spinal cord from an exostosis of second cervical vertebra. Lond Edinburg Mon J Sci 1843;3:194-8. |
| 18. | Oberndorf C A case of multiple exostoses coupled with syringomyelia. N Y Med J 1910;91:479-83. |
| 19. | Singh DS, Rao SS, Sharma S, Srivastava KK, Yadav SS Cervical cord compression from multiple hereditary exostoses. J Assoc Physicians India 1980;28:535-7. |
| 20. | Blaauw G Osteocartilaginous exostosis of the spine. In: Handbook of clinical neurology. (edited by P. J. Vinken and G. W. Bruyn). North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 1975. pp. 313-9. |
| 21. | Palmer FJ, Blum PW Osteochondroma with spinal cord compression: report of three cases. J Neurosurg 1980;52:842-5. |
| 22. | Rose EF, Fekete A Odontoid osteochondroma causing sudden death. report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 1964;42:606-9. |
| 23. | Tully RJ, Pickens J, Oro J, Levine C Hereditary multiple exostoses and cervical cord compression: CT and MR studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989;13:330-3. |
| 24. | Román G Hereditary multiple exostoses. A rare cause of spinal cord compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1978;3:230-3. |
| 25. | Moriwaka F, Hozen H, Nakane K, Sasaki H, Tashiro K, Abe H Myelopathy due to osteochondroma: MR and CT studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:128-30. |
| 26. | Tuncer S, Erden I, Aydin N, Oge D Acute spinal cord compression in hereditary multiple exostoses: case report. Paraplegia 1989;27:402-5. |
| 27. | Buur T, Mørch MM Hereditary multiple exostoses with spinal cord compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46: 96-8. |
| 28. | Yu X, Wang B, Yang SM, Han SB, Jiang L, Liu XG, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus open surgical resection for spinal osteoid osteoma. Spine J 2019;19:509-15. |
| 29. | Chiurco AA Multiple exostoses of bone with fatal spinal cord compression; report of a case and brief review of the literature. Neurology 1970;20:275-8. |
| 30. | Misra UK, Nag D, Dave VS, Shukla R, Kar AM Cervical cord compression due to chondromatous change in a patient with metaphysial aclasis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:1155-7. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
[Table 1]
|
